{"created":"2023-05-15T10:54:57.063010+00:00","id":4687,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"ed48ecb7-019d-4882-9766-dc1a83ccf212"},"_deposit":{"created_by":17,"id":"4687","owners":[17],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4687"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:juen.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004687","sets":["993:994:1003"]},"author_link":["14346","14347"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1998-09","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicPageEnd":"201","bibliographicPageStart":"191","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"18","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"上越教育大学研究紀要"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"読解力を測定するテストの一つにリコール（recall）テストがある。平野（1998）では，学力上位校の高校生にリコールテストを課した。学力が異なると，採点基準の違いが読解のリコールに及ばす影響が異なるかどうかを調べるために，本研究では，学力の低い高校生を対象に，リコール・プロトコル（recall protocol）の異なった採点基準による採点（厳密な採点基準とややゆるやかな採点基準）が，（1）テクスト全体，（2）テクスト中の重要な情報（主題文全体），（3）各パラグラフ全体，（4）各パラグラフの主題，の再生量にどのような影響を及ばすかを検証した。その結果，（1）2種類の採点基準の相関は極めて高かった。すなわちテクスト全体のリコールでは，2種類の採点基準の相関係数は．983で，重要な情報量（主題文全体）のリコールでは，．942であった。また（2）各パラグラフ間の再生率の違いが，採点基準の違いによって異なった。しかし各パラグラフの主題間の再生率の違いは異なった採点基準の影響を受けなかった。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"This study investigates the effects of two different scoring criteria on the written recall of an expository text. Using both a strict and a loose criterion of recall, the written recalls of 36 Japanese EFL high school students (focusing on students with low proficiency) were scored. The results revealed that the correlation between the strict and the loose criterion was extremely high for the total number of idea units recalled correctly (r= .98, p< .01). This finding for Japanese high school students with low proficiency supported the very high correlation found with Japanese graduate students in Hirano (1996), and Japanese high school students with high proficiency (Hirano 1998). For the total number of main ideas recalled correctly, the correlation was also high (r= .94, p< .01) . In addition, the criterion of scoring recall protocols applied proved to be a significant factor which affected the comparisons of the recall of each paragraph . This finding also reaffirmed the results of Hirano (1996), and Hirano (1998). That is, significant differences were found between the strict and the loose criterion in terms of the percentage of correct recall across paragraphs. For the recall of each paragaraph main idea, however, there were no significant differences between the strict and the loose criterion in terms of the percentage of correct recall across paragaraph main ideas.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"上越教育大学"}]},"item_10002_relation_12":{"attribute_name":"論文ID（NAID）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type":"isIdenticalTo","subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"AN10284863","subitem_relation_type_select":"NAID"}}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0915-8162","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"平野,  絹枝"},{"creatorName":"ヒラノ, キヌエ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"14346","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Hirano,  Kinue","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"14347","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2015-06-17"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"kiyo18_1-13.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"477.2 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"kiyo18_1-13.pdf","url":"https://juen.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4687/files/kiyo18_1-13.pdf"},"version_id":"0d166806-ec90-4684-8977-3647b7862407"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"リコール","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"リコール・プロトコル","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"評価","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"厳密な採点基準","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ゆるやかな採点基準","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"recall","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"recall protocols","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"assessment","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"strict criterion","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"loose criterion","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ETYP:教育実践","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"STYP:高等学校","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"SSUB:英語","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"採点基準の違いが読解のリコールに及ぼす影響 : 高校生(下位者)の場合","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"採点基準の違いが読解のリコールに及ぼす影響 : 高校生(下位者)の場合","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"17","path":["1003"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2009-05-22"},"publish_date":"2009-05-22","publish_status":"0","recid":"4687","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["採点基準の違いが読解のリコールに及ぼす影響 : 高校生(下位者)の場合"],"weko_creator_id":"17","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-03-11T04:50:13.785475+00:00"}